Greetings onto you, the readers. Be it that you are politician or simple reader, this article is to help this nation have a look at itself as a whole, and when we look at the House of Commons, has our government become a public courthouse where all members of parliament elected to govern our mud-slinging as to prove to the public who is greatest and who is worse? This article is not in favor of any one party, be it Conservative, Liberal or NDP. It is merely a reminder for each of you in parliament that you had your turn in partaking in the disruption of Canada. If we look at the benefits to the nation in the last month, no accomplishment has been attained or achieved because of this mud-slinging, setting back the affairs of the nation, that claims to be a peacekeeper in other countries, while it is warring in its own parliament system. What is a peacekeeper? What member of parliament could really say that he works for the nation? If we look at an article from the Constitution Amendment of 1982, under the Human Right Act, where the very first line under the word ‘Constitution’, it states that: ”…this nation was founded in the recognition of the supremacy of God”. If this very article, under the Constitution’s Amendment of 1982 is already broken, the whole constitution has been fragmented, and therefore; we cannot function under no guidelines. If anyone in parliament could claim to be a believer in this God of the constitution, why are the affairs of the nation in the way they are today? Perhaps, without being religious, but since you mentioned the word “God”, do we not look more as the Old Testament, where it says: “eye for eye, tooth for tooth”? Isn’t this contrary to offer the other cheek? Not to be religious about this, but in the common sense of simple words: what god are you referring to, in the constitution? If I ask you to prove to me that this God exists, what would you show me; the condition of this nation? And if you do believe in this god that you wrote about, is he responsible for the crime of this nation? If so, what god is it? The blueprint of a nation: where all elected people should walk across the floor to each other and acknowledge publicly that somewhere, somehow, their individual parties have failed the nation, and recognize the scandals that have been pretreated and begin truly working for the nation, instead of tying to prove who is greatest and who is the least. If for a moment, I go to the God I believe in, and I use a few of his words here, (and please, not religiously, it might be offensive) are you not arguing as to who will sit first in the seat at the next election? But verily, I tell you, when the time comes you will be nowhere to be seen if only to admit that you were sitting in that seat of corruption, that now you are trying to justly claim to your own party. It is not mud slinging, because facts speak for themselves. I am not against any of the parliamentary people, because we have as much to change in society as in government. If we look at the origin, at the beginning of the confederation, when the provinces were territories, what was used to bring them to form a confederation and mutually accept to be come to be known as Canada, under the BNA act? Try and imagine if you have no records of the words that may have been used for instance, to convince Manitoba to become a province, after the vicious warring against Riel, who was trying to protect the rights of minority, charged and hung for treason, where now, we have corrected the file, but no Riel alive. What do we do with the nation? We have attacked churches, residential schools; the very system that begun what is supposed to be known as civilization. There was a lot of good into the teachings brought in through the missionaries who were truly devoted to the blueprint of happiness for a nation where "eye for eye, tooth for tooth" became: "embrace your enemy". It is not to defend the wrongs that took place in the churches, even if the teachings were brought in by a military environment, it doesn’t take away from the reality of the learning how to love one another by the example of a man that many believe crazy, but who was and is the true author of a euphoria, an era of peace, and peace among you. We urge you to think for a moment, if it were your sons or daughters that were being slandered across the nation in the name of justice. Would you sit still and not defend your son or daughter, risking your life for that of his or her own, if you have any such a thing known as love in your heart? I have trusted you as members of parliament through the electoral system, known the past of the Conservative, the NDP, the Liberals, the era of Duplessis, the residential schools issues, the many First Nation issues, unresolved, and we are talking about balance, and good accounting. If the word of man is not good enough, why bother with his signature? On our next articles, we will bring you answers to these problems; and I wish for all parties to wish if they are truly working for the people, to cross the floor to each other and bring out the good of everyone by allowing them to learn through their mistakes as you have, as Conservative, in the last elections, where now you claim to have a solution to these problems. As for the Liberals that are licking their wounds, I am not against you either, but many attempts have been made to you the politicians, who always claim to be the best listeners, and you have to be dragged into the public place, before you admit defeat. The status quo is a dangerous state of mind because either you are deaf, uninterested or unqualified to face problems and that the proof is your silence. We are seeking to bring together this nation, and not religiously again, but I think that the sovereignty of the God that you so write about in the Constitution Act has been ignored a little bit too long, or it doesn’t work. But to convince me that his sovereignty doesn’t work, show me anything that he has commanded, since you know him, where it has also failed. And I think we should all get back to the drawing board of realizing that wisdom is not born of man. Man speaks of intelligence. This is why he has limits and the proof is the state of the country. Many may say: ‘What political experience do you have?’ I would answer simply: ‘I am glad it’s not like yours because then, I would repeat your mistakes.’ But you would never admit that you were my teacher. So on a good and happy footnote, what is the alternative to our problems? This website is not a dragline into forever to make you wish that there is a solution when there isn’t. NO. When you go fishing, if you don’t leave the line in the water long enough, for sure you won’t eat tonight. Perhaps when you get hungry enough, you’ll get on the line and ask for the food. Isn’t it what we call, again, not religiously, fisher of men? I long to hear from you, because watching you hurt when there are solutions would make me as bad as those who committed those errors that you are now facing. This is why the status quo should many times be a criminal offense. But I do believe in Canada, because I am part of it. I have no hatred and I side with no one. I belong with everyone. Maybe that’s why they call it the House of Commons. But are you common with each other in your relationships as elected people of the nation? Shouldn’t the king celebrate with those who have elected him, rather then rule over him as if he were greater? And the proof always comes out at election time. This is why we’ve had many kings as leaders of the nation, such as Mackenzie King, but everything passes but the land remains. Whoever is good enough will be loved by everyone by being just fair, no patronage, and that equal portion is not 90-10 but 50-50. That is what you call balance. Those interested will show an interest in the nation. So far, you have all kept silent, as if the nation matters not. It is a race for the musical chair. But the song that the chair plays is not very pleasing to the nation. So if you do as under oath you were sworn in, have any caring for this nation, you will get on the line and go fishing for answers that will overwhelm you because what I want for this nation also includes you, whoever reads this. On a last footnote, to the Government in place: I am not against you, but since you are the government now, this address is to you personally: If you have, at heart, the well being of all Canadians, you will come forward and seek this incredible new venture where Canada could be a role model for all nations. From what I hear, the desires of Paul Martin (the Prime Minster) is to change Canada totally, in the next ten years. I think it is time to start listening because you have presented nothing but electoral promises, as we are accustomed to at every election. It is not the billion spent that grows the economy. It is how you spend it, not how you throw it away, in a way to buy votes, as in the time of my Grandfather in Trois Rivieres Quebec, who lost his elections, so that the road was paved, up to his farm by the opposition party and he was left on gravel for having voted for the wrong party. I remember that. Any political party that lessens the people because they did not vote for them, their electoral process has already determined patronage, because those who have elected them will be favored over those who have questions over them. We are looking forward to hearing from you, anyone who dares to care about this nation. So far, little interest has been showed but interesting enough, the readers of our website have increased over 400% in the matter of a few weeks. So if these articles sell, I guess people like to hear them. Quite an incentive, at a time of an election! We pray for the nation, for all parties to finally be honest in admitting their wrongs. Many men and women are in jail for lesser crimes because they do not have the political connections that most of you have and this is an abuse of power that if one must be punished for certain crime one way, then so can the other and should be. But likewise, if one could be spared jail, because of influence peddling, why don’t we give the same treatment to the one that does not have influence peddling? Food for thought. We could help you reduce the Solicitor General's Department budget in half, while increasing the security of the nation, by reinforcing the less fortunate to the awakening of a new nation, where they too, as you in parliament have hoped to be forgiven for their actions, as you are now portraying changes through election promises to make the nation forget the crime that were just perpetrated. A good advice, what have you got to lose, to listen, with an open mind, but with an intent of honesty, if perhaps for the first time in your life, and I would be the first one to forgive you. So my friends, as John Diefenbaker would say: "My dear fellow Canadians: unity is made of many units bonded by desires and not fences." Have a good day. God bless this nation, since we recognize his sovereignty, perhaps in words only. How about trying them out and see the results? For all that you have been reading on this website, is given through wisdom, certainly not from the education of man, for otherwise, it would be like you, without answers. I love Canada. I love you all. Looking forward to the next article, the one that will bring you insight to a blueprint of peace that would spread like the ocean to every continent in a matter of moments storm in all hearts at once. God bless you. Hope to read you soon through e-mail and to political parties. You are welcome, not to make us a member of your party, because then we would be against the others, but to bring all parties together. Isn’t the word party about unity? Thank you. From The Master