Is it not a subject that everyone wishes we didn’t have to talk about?  Or are our wishes to keep the debate going, without thinking of how simple it would be to deal with?  By the way, forgive me, I am a man and I would like to voice an opinion that makes a lot of sense.

I think everyone should have pro-choice.  But use it, if you will.  Because if I were a woman, since my body would be a subject of conversation as to where  I have the right to decide or not, I think I would take my decision before I get into the act – make a choice, since we all know the simplicity of getting pregnant.  And let’s not be religious here, but personally, I’d rather use protection then having to deal with the life of a human being.  So I think I’d make my pro-choice right there.

But then again, last night, I was thinking if I were a woman, whether dealing with pro-choice or pro-life, I’d ask myself if I were not opening myself up to let any man use me as he pleases, for the sake of flesh, and then walk away, perhaps leaving my name for some friends of theirs, that they could come at my door?  I think that personally I would not allow any man to come near, unless It meant something different than a sexual moment to him, by respecting myself.  And on the part of the man, if you have lusting eyes over a certain woman, if her body will excite you that much, that you have to get into your venture, please don’t get any kids involved, if the woman lets herself be for  that purpose only, in order to have a man looking at her.

Even governments are very irresponsible towards the issue of respect for woman.  By allowing pornography and sexual fashions; to trigger the minds of their boys, to the detriment of the family, aren’t all these issues falling back on the table of family values, morality versus immorality, and family breakdowns because of those immoralities?  And then you could go to any type of flesh venture, whether it is between man and man or man and woman.  If we could fight to legalize the flesh by fighting abortion, then marry anything.  Even man to his dog because what is flesh is nothing but flesh and that’s why the nation is a condom-nation, where crime is at a high.  Men see not value in woman, either by using them or exploiting them,  or going for men instead, and likewise with woman.  So doesn’t this bring us to other doors of dangerous consequences?

A few years ago I read on the headline line of a strange paper: “Dinosaurs disappeared because they all turned gay.”  Let’s just look at the logic of this.  If man and woman are so dissatisfied with each other, is this the new definition of marriage, to the point that the family has no protection anymore; that children mean nothing, that woman mean nothing, that men mean nothing?  And we throw more wood in the fire by opening up more explicit sexuality, even to teach in schools sexuality to little children, while banning morality and values to safeguard the structure of the family.

So pro-choice, make your choice before you get into bed, then we don’t have to deal with the issue of abortion.  But if you are too damn lazy before you get into bed, don’t involve the nation after you do, because we don’t have to pay for your mistakes. 

In this, if the government took its responsibilities, instead of burdening the tax payers with supporting through welfare ventures these families of all these men who have walked away, leaving woman in despair with children, the tax payers should not have to pay a penny of this, and these men should be forced look after their own seed walking around as dead corpse without love.  We are an immoral nation, banning, under the disguise of freedom of expression, but in these immoral issues, you grant the freedom of expression to immorality and you tell the morality people to butt out.  If you were to be fair to both sides, these discussions wouldn’t be allowed, but obviously, the votes always matter.

As we venture to higher costs of healthcare, violence, and we insist on family violence, because of politicians who promote pornography, and I will say child abuse, as they claim to fight child abuse.  They know very well that pornography is visible even for children on television, magazines and even street fashion.  So we are a nation that forms their own pedophiles, sexual harassers, prostitution, and all forms of sexual immoralities under the disguise of freedom of expression. 

If I dare tell a woman passing by half-naked, that she’s got nice breasts, she could charge me with sexual harassment, but I can’t charge her with sexually harassing me.  I guess the laws are made by men.  That’s why they don’t want to cut off their own pleasures, but I am on the side of the family, on the side of the women who have had let themselves go to pornography at home to try and keep their weak-minded men home.  And unfortunately there are too many sick clergy who will promote sexual immoralities in marriage, under the disguise of a marriage license and certificate from a church.  How do you define marriage?  How do you define the union of man and woman?  When you tell woman she has to submit to oral sex and trash in marriage, so you can’t speak against homosexuals, because what is flesh is nothing but flesh and when the morality and true understanding of the meaning of life will be truly defined if at all we will be happy.

Just to tell you how far behind we are:
Imagine in the bible this morning, reading that King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines and the Ten Commandments say: ‘Thou shall not commit adultery.’  Don’t you say with me “HOLY” bible?  What man has written, stands to be corrected.  But what God has instituted will never fail man.  Let us get out of parables and start living the life that was meant to be inside of  us for the purpose of a world of peace without physical domination over the minds.

So pro-choice, I agree with you.  For pro-choice, as least make your choice before you get into bed.  Don’t involve a child into it.  And for woman, all women, if you could want one child but not the other because you have children of your own, most of you, or you wish to have one, is it like Wal-Mart, you only take the ones you like?  You’ll find that the price is higher than Wal-Mart for these actions, when the nation has to deal with the issues. 

And by the way, on a little fun note, Pierre Elliot Trudeau had passed a bill at one time, that said ‘the nations’ governments have no business in the bedroom.’  So get out of it.  And teach the people well.  It is a duty as leader of a nation to keep it in morality, so that they can live divinity.

God bless you.  See you on our next article.
Roger Poisson