Are we for or against globalization?  The answer is yes and no.  Then again, yes, after modification.

What is globalization?  Let us say in a form of democracy or imperialism or perhaps in a socialistic way, or even communist way: don’t we have in this the example of the four forms of globalization, available to mankind?

We’d like to tell you (not to confuse you) that there is a fifth form of globalization, one that takes the bits and pieces from every other one, because every one of the four forms of globalization mentioned above have a common faulty factor of selfishness, greed and dictatorship.

So how could you remove these faults from the four, without bringing in these viruses?  Let us explain.

Globalization for economic reasons only becomes sterilization of the human race, because the four viruses have never mentioned the intent of family values, respect and the potential of a greater society that could only be when the well being of others is before that of your own.

What would we call globalization?  A one-world government?  What would be the name of this one-world government?  What would be its leadership?  Would it be African, Asian, White, Aboriginal, not to mention all the interracial ventures that have caused new societies? 

For instance, on the issues of marriage, we have created new societies.  How come that every problem of the world is tied into over population, the diminishing of the family value?  And I ask you now, to take time to read this: we mentioned overpopulation, but in a world where the family diminishes.  How could it overpopulate in diminishing the family? So there is, where the birth of sterilization took place, life control by tangible means as birth control, protection of any kind and deliberately interrupting the purpose of life.

Globalization is to bring unity in a family environment for all nations, where immorality promoted and accepted, by those qualifying themselves as to be able to maintain a world population, while the family exists no more.  So globalizations in the four forms have proven that the family environment, (globally) is non-existent in the structure of globalization that is domination.

It is not by domination that you will attain a brighter society, even if sterilization and world control population was to be achieved through the excessive debauchery of immorality.  It would be like force-feeding chickens to lay more eggs until they can’t produce anymore, but that there’s no more eggs for breakfast because the population has gone.

To prove to you that the four aggressive ways through dictatorship of the above four mentioned method of globalization, there is no intent of equality, justice, and respect for all nations of the world.  Here is the proof:

A few days ago, a young university student who happens to be secretary of a member of parliament in our present government, tells me that in a university in Ottawa (so close to the government), they teach globalization in an anti-American way, even telling me that the American government would, as their democracy are the aggressors in the world.  In such, trying to justify socialistic views in the form of globalization.  But here is the catch!

We attach here a copy of the true definition of globalization by the socialistic views of the United Nations for a one-world government, where these good men in black have proven their true structure of selfishness and corrupted leaders in bringing water to the African nations in the form of help; but putting a padlock to it until they pay for it.  This is a socialistic type of globalization, taught in our universities against democracy, where now these same people, because of pressures of the world, have forgiven loans to African nations that cannot pay for them.  They are in starvation. But now again, because of more pressure, these good “globalizing” people where our Prime Minister, Paul Martin is claimed to be a genius of, are willing to be generous to these African nations by helping them for food in the forms of loans.  Where they have just proven to themselves by forgiving loans that they don’t have the ability to pay for that.

But now, listen to the agenda behind this, globalization of hypocrites:

They intend to take over the natural resources of Africa, as a collateral on the loans, with the promise of jobs at minimum wages, perhaps $2.00 an hour where they would take over the gold, diamonds, uranium and sell it at high price in Europe and North America.  Strangely enough, the former advisor to the United Nations, socialist United Nation, guided by a man who had to resign for fraud in the oil for food scandal in the U.N., and now honoured in Canada in the order of Canada by his partner that he advises in the same corrupted way, our Prime Minister, Paul Martin how to get out of scandals by money powers, as we have seen where the political system of Canada is as corrupted as its head.

And through all this, the Canadian people are gullible enough or too lazy to stand and vote for decency, instead of being black mailed with promises like the billboards of Quebec, trying to prove that Canada was united when its at its worst division.

Globalization, since we spoke of the socialist way, we have to be fair to the democratic way of definition.  Democracy, freedom and the American Dream, where one says: “I will impose democracy the world over to rid ourselves of fanatics, religious fanatics, terrorists.”  Why is democracy so hard to sell to the world?

Like socialism, democracy seemed to have no legs to stand on.  If so, it would be presented in a simple way that the whole nation would accept.  But again, in democracy, there is greed, selfishness, power, pride, racism, and white supremacy in the absence of justice, equality and freedom. And I quote the words of a president: “If you are not with me, you’re against me.” Sort of saying, “I lead.  There’s no freedom in this.”

The third form of globalization, communism, in the United Nations we should say the socialist United Nation, because the majority of the voting shares of the United Nation are of communist origin, since its founding and agreed to remain this way or no United Nation.  In 1956 Nikita Krustchev then president of the Soviet Union, removed his shoe at the United Nation and banged on the desk with it, angry and said to America, “Without a fight, we’ll take you.”  Already the United Nation is dominated by communist countries.  It explains why the Iraqi crisis, saw the American defying the world in going to Iraq.  Is this democracy freedom?  Is there a unity or a conspiracy between democracy and socialism?

Communism is an idealist form of governing in maintaining power by imposing unknown sanctions against its own people.  Just as in the times of war, sanctions become the most effective method to dominate.  In such, communism is as evil as socialistic views and democratic views unless we take the best of all and come united in the mutual agreement to build a life for all of mankind.

Now we’ll go imperialism, which is a monarchy overshadowing a dictatorship.  Example, the laws of Canada taking their roots into monarchy, where Canada is deemed a free nation, which is of British subject.  Did you know that the word British in Hebrew means ‘covenant people’?  ‘Brit’ is covenant, ‘ish’ is people, like Ishmael, the people of Israel. 

What difference is there between monarchy and dictatorship or the word imperialist?  They all fit one in the same.  They all have ruling over a people.  For instance the word imperial is a measure, like the imperial gallon, a measure of one is allowed of man, before a currency.  Monarchy is like fairy tale with silver slippers and glamorous, soft, spoken names.  This is why that monarchy has its own name as in the famous glass, which is called a monarch, a single lens glass as the eye of an eagle to oversee things, overseas.  So monarchy is a generous giver or should we say to share of what was acquired by force and even false pretence and then make believe to be shared with the subject of the monarch.  Why do we speak this way?  Is that in French monarchy, when a church was used to overtake a people in the disguise of God?  I guess that’s because God always simplifies things for you so you may use his name in vain, when in your own document you say of these people, to get knowledge of God but reduced to obey the monarch of France.

Strangely, treaties were signed, a bit like we see today, in excessive world population that must be controlled, otherwise everyone will be poor.  So were they, people of the land of Canada, in such large numbers that you get rid of 100 and 1,000 pop up.  “We may lose this so, let’s sign some treaties.”

So half of Canada was taken by force and the other half still unsettled but surrendered into document that may have made it impossible for either side to win.  So monarchy left us the brilliant mind of the mess we’re in today.

So now we come to the fifth and only form of globalization.

First of all, globalization is a mission for all people, not just the few.  The beauty of true globalization is unlike the globalization of human intent.  By force or secret societies to corral he world without anyone knowing, that is evil.  It resembles declaring a war and forcing the young to the front.  A true globalization, with intent for all, would lay out a blueprint of civilization for all of mankind to bring under control with the desire of every living, equality, peace, love and to remove famine, in which every living upon earth would in a majority vote for such a globalization that could only begin by the respect of individuality in a family environment where all would be equal.  In such a joy, world population control would become self-conducting.  Healthcare costs would diminish in the global gift of hope of a world of justice for all, dominated by all, not the few, with a rotating government that would be comprised of a seat I never nation.  And in this global government, where the management would have to be with the unanimous consent of every village that are now called nations under the umbrella of a global unified family.

Only in such, globalization could take roots and the civilization factor in its success has to take roots, not in democracy, communism, socialism, imperialism, but in the roots of human value for what you wish for yourself, you will grant to others first.  And in such, everyone will know the power of a superior being in the unity of minds.  That is globalization.

We now offer to the leaders that have asked for help to make globalization possible, to meet at no cost to them to bring about a blueprint that they too must learn of, in order to be qualified to make globalization a unification of all nations.  Imagine the L20 organization have 16 nations out of 193.  Is globalization for a lifetime?  It could be if they answer to their own call to bring them, a man or a woman, be he a god or a demon, to help them for this to come true.  So help me God, since the demon has failed.

Our red phone line is:

People’s Political Power Party of Canada

Phone: (204) 233-6087, Fax: (204) 233-6217

E-mail: info@peoplespoliticalpower.ca