| |
|
|
||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Many people question the moral values of politicians. No need to ask why – the facts are there. Is the People’s Political Power Party of Canada interested in politics? The answer is no, just like politicians are not interested in the People’s Political Power Party of Canada, because of its moral values and standards. Imagine, in a face-to-face, the two before the eyes of the nation. As for us, we are not about confrontation but about facts that cannot be denied. (You the reader that is reading this article, I would forewarn you that moral values have to be in all directions, not expecting it from some but rejecting it ourselves.) We don’t go by the gallop polls for popularity, since we all know that the truth hurts. But like a toothache, you feel good when the pain’s gone. We invite you, Canadians, to voice yourself this time on moral values. We will give you a few examples of our policies towards making Canada the number one place in the world. If, for instance, we have absolute respect for woman in her motherly way, would we not at the same time, have stability in the family; where the children would benefit and there would be no need to talk about pro-life and pro-choice. We could go to Bill C38 and since we involve Bill C38, let us involve also all marriages – since the issue is about marriage. And now, strangely though wisdom, we could legally say same-sex marriage in what we call ‘genuine’ marriages, because sexuality has become marriage, be it between man and woman or man and man or woman and woman. Has it ever happened once (in your so called marriages - however you see it) that you cried out for the birth of a child, every time that you said, “I love you”? Marriages today, if we go by statistics, are licenses to justify sexuality, so it matters not how you present it, because if sexuality was non-existent, in any types of marriages, be it gay or otherwise – would there be marriages? The moral values take their boundaries into the love between people for the purpose of hatching in each other’s heart to become one. In such the proof will be the child. If we look at all the different forms of preventing love from fulfilling its purpose through contraception, the morning after pill and calendar methods – these are all obstructions to the purpose of becoming one in the child. Could we not ban abortion now, since there’s no excuse to get pregnant anymore since you have all these methods of prevention? Why must we put an innocent child on the butcher block for economical reasons or otherwise? This is not justifying birth control. It is justifying killing as a deadly criminal offence, when you have so many other options since you speak not of love when you speak of marriage. Our position is to ban abortion, under the guidance of all other methods, approved to ban the birth of a child. And from there, if we go to establish the absolute respect for woman, no one could say that he has love for her unless respect is provided in such. So you have our definition, clear definition on the issue of marriage and we propose to remove the word ‘marriage’ from all these unions that are ungodly, including Church marriages with an intent to stop the purpose of life. We will propose instead for those who will truly be ready, through proper education, in absolute respect for the family, have a new Bill that will define marriage in the structure of the family environment, as we propose it in becoming parents to this nation, that we be the parents of a federation and not a confederation. The Churches must re-strengthen the powers of truth in to the teachings and preaching and to remove the obstacles to love, under the disguise of economic reasons and to re-take position on the true definition of love, the only cause to justify marriage. We thank you for reading and we are prepared to give every member of this nation all the necessary means to discover true love for the first time through the understanding of the purpose of man and woman. Thank you for reading. Roger Poisson
|