| |
|
|
||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|||
Strangely, a world without faith finds the best selling book in the story of the one they believe not in. It is like ganging up to put an end to this mystery, somewhat like pain in putting a criminal in jail. So millions of people are investing - either in trying to prove Christ or to put an end to his legacy. Either way, he has the attention of both: the believers and the non-believers. Strangely, a few weeks ago here in Canada (and I ask you to pay attention to these words) everyone received a document that was condemned by God who spoke to King David and rebuked him for doing a census, if the Scriptures are true (for the doubters). Now, if we go to the oldest manuscript of the Scriptures, we find that Joseph went to Jerusalem to register for the census. As such, I’m sure he put his wife down and his son Jesus. It would be beneficial to him because you pay fewer taxes if you have a family. So now, since it is so important like in Canada and as a matter of fact, there is law for Statistics Canada to keep records of all censuses so that they could analyze the population activities, movement and vital statistics. Wouldn’t that mean that until Jesus was on his own he was recorded in a census? So since we’re such experts at telling of the people of the past, today with supposed facts, we should be able to pull the records of the census, which would be the only accurate facts. Now we go back to when a follower of Jesus came to him and said: “We have to pay taxes and we have no money.” (and we say again, for the non-believers - if the oldest document is true) Then Jesus said: “Go to the lake. You will see a fish. Open his mouth and you will find two shekels: one for you and one for me. And pay our dues.” So doesn’t that say that Jesus agreed to pay his own dues and his apostles? Now since we’re trying to prove him as God or not, would he not have paid his taxes every year? If not he would have contradicted himself. That would be proof that he wasn’t God. And then another place: they came to him to corner him, again on the tax system and remember tied into the census, because every tax collected would be matched with the census to make sure that everybody paid taxes. So they asked him: “Are you telling us that man doesn’t have to pay taxes?” And again, as we say he was looking after the “business affairs” of his father, he said: “Do you have a coin? Whose face is on the coin?” They replied “Tiberius Caesar.” “Therefore,” he said, “Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God.” What is the difference between the two? One is almsgiving; the other one is forcing people to pay for what they don’t believe in. So, through the census and until the last time Christ paid his taxes, they have the records up to his crucifixion, as they have no excuses for no record of taxes. And now what the experts say about the Last Supper, in the Da Vinci code: strangely, in 1983 I jumped into a large garbage bin. There were many copies; I would say hundreds of issues of the National Geographic magazine. Coincidently or divinely (we’ll let you decide) the centerfold of one was the Da Vinci painting of the Last Supper. I kept it. It intrigued me. Perhaps it was divine guidance made me feel like keeping it. But now that the Da Vinci code is out, where people are paying to see the dissection of the life of Christ or perhaps without knowing, yearning for its truth. On this article that we ask you to click here and here, with the actual Da Vinci Last Supper and we will give you to read that the world’s leading expert in the restoration of paintings have concluded: there is not one pigment left of the original painting of Da Vinci, that it was all manipulated by false restorers, where in such you could have turned Jesus into Mary Magdalene and no one would know. So now, this supposedly famous expert who was just an artist and according to National Geographic, Da Vinci was not a great artist. He was mediocre artist, where his talent was left in question. And we hail him, us, ourselves or the writers of the Da Vinci code as experts of a painting that is hidden behind another one on the same canvas. The original isn’t there anymore. Now, trying to say that Jesus married: and if he never filled the census and not to tell of his children, then he was a fraud cheating the government of taxes, but someone was looking for ways to disprove him as the Son of God. How could he have walked through centuries with his kids and Mary Magdalene as a wife, when his father Joseph had to flee to Egypt not to be caught in the census of Jerusalem? Da Vinci Code? And now since we know that he is of the rarest type of blood: AB, so wouldn’t it be easy for DNA to pull out the few rare cases of AB blood type in the descendants of Israel, which would narrow it down to one country, and then in the descendants of David? Because you see, my ancestors who were Lords, whose name used to be Hecht: in Hebrew, meaning “fish” and apparently of the descendants of King David. Holy, am I in the blood of Christ? Because my name is fish! The Apostles used the sign of the fish. He multiplied the fish and wisdom comes from holiness, from divinity. I ask you to remember that there’s a big difference between Da Vinci and divinity. Da Vinci was an imperfect painter, where his last Supper doesn’t exist because it is buried under three hundred artists. And when these experts, according to the National Geographic have proven such, now can you contradict the true experts that are still living today? If the Last Supper needed restoration back then in the 1700’s, could you imagine the mess of it now with these extra oils and pigment that would disturb the authenticity of the original Da Vinci? And to end: was Da Vinci living at the time of Christ? Where did he get his figures from and also the upper room? He did it by speculation of what was assumed that they might have looked like, because it was a criminal offense back then to have any carvings and paintings of anyone upon earth. It was a blasphemy. The proof of this that the leading experts in the Shroud of Turin are still trying to assume what the man of the Shroud could have really looked like. Now imagine Da Vinci with his paintbrush trying to paint someone he’s never seen! And now an expert tells us that he knows what Da Vinci was painting, which is now under pigments, while Da Vinci was assuming that it would have been like this. For the readers: there’s a big surprise for you – way beyond Da Vinci’s because there is a race around the world for the Holy Grail. But remember that in DNA research, they are talking about cloning the Shroud of Turin. So therefore, they confirm that it is not a painting because you can’t clone paint. So isn’t this admitting that the Shroud has real blood? And then of the same blood type: AB as Christ. Also tied in to another piece of linen or should I say two, the Veil of Veronica and the Oviedo in Spain which is to have covered the face of Christ from the top of the head to under the chin. And with all the research in the world, still trying to prove what the man of the Shroud would look like, now we’re going to tell you that we have greater than the Grail itself, because the Grail is only like the vestment that he would wear. Remember the woman who was bleeding who said: “If I could only touch his vestment.” So anything that touched Christ becomes sanctified by him. Now for the mystery of mysteries being unveiled to you: the blood of the Shroud reveals the identity in multiple coloured photographs taken from microscopic fractions of drops of blood from within; where we could prove what we say beyond any doubt. And now what is the biggest miracle of the Shroud? It is that not only that the Shroud bears this but any photograph taken from it you could bring to us and even what your eyes have never seen from the face of the Shroud, we will reveal it to you from any photograph taken of the divine mystery of the Shroud of Turin. In such, only God is permitted to carve to his own image. Every photographic means of proving, providing that man has not manipulated anything with his hands, we could prove the presence of Christ in everything that God has created. You, yourself, whether you are male or female, you can’t make a child. You can’t put life in a tangible structure and the proof is that you can’t make yourself live forever. So how could you give life unless greater than you partakes in giving it reality? Interested in what has touched the body of Christ, his burial cloth that we could prove beyond any doubt because it contains the whole history of mankind, from creation into forever. And this is not fiction. It is facts. Try us. You will be overwhelmed as I am. Thank you for reading and remember, a live scenery is always better than a painting because you can’t smell the flowers in the painting, much less feel the wind and breathe the air. These are false images. Since we talk about cloning as possible, even for two or three thousand years old thing, doesn’t this confirm that statement of this man Jesus? "Your son was only sleeping.” And now you confirm that he was telling the truth, since you say that you could clone. Perhaps that is what he meant, that we could dig out our ancestors from the cemeteries and star cloning them. Only God gives life and he continues it but he doesn’t repeat it because if God went backwards, eternity would end. Because when you make a u-turn you give up on your direction. Thank you for reading and you may reach us at : Mission of the Shroud |
