| |
|
|
||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|||
Greetings. After the leadership convention of the Liberal Party, we see that Stéphane Dion strangely made the top position, while within the Liberals there was grumbling … even as to say that he is Harper’s victory in the next election. If you look within every political party’s leadership convention, you will always notice when the time comes to cross to the most popular one, you have a large number going French to French and a large number of English going the other way. Imagine within the same party, the same thing happens in every leadership convention. Notice that Quebec always has so much power when it comes to bringing French Canada to the possibilities of Prime Minister. We know why - because they have so many seats in the House of Commons that they could play opposition – even out of office – by simply pulling everything towards the French side. Sometimes the English have done this. And if we look at old politics, where English Canada had a stronger hold on Quebec than now, do you see now the difference that the awakened Quebecers are suddenly speaking out at the right time? Why do we put a question mark? Because as proud Quebecers we like to see the French dealing with the French. And that seems to be the criteria for the election of French leadership. Let us go now to the subject of Canada: What does Canada have that is so powerful that we need false billboards to speak about unity, that we dump the First Nation issue aside to favour passing in Parliament the recognition for the French, while ignoring the plight of the First Nation? If we look at the position of the Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, a definite direction towards separatism, if we add their seats to the Liberal seats in Parliament and to the independents and NDP, Quebec would have a majority government. They would run the nation, just tike they did with Trudeau, Mulroney, Chretien, Duplessis (the ‘dictator’… that we must remind people was a Conservative, a true blue, in-the-face) and now the smaller parties that are fighting for marijuana. What a deal! Others are for more green leaves and clean air but I have yet to find one that ever speaks on behalf of the so-called debate at hand now, the definition of marriage, in a different form than simply a man and a woman. You might be confused if you see them talking together. You might think they’re married, if that’s all it is – a man and a woman (strangely, no talk about the children). We talk about the surviving green trees but very little about the surviving family where it takes a male and a female as interested in the family as Greenpeace is in the trees and ecology. What is Canada - land of the free at a high price? What is Canada, according to you? Never mind talking about nature and lakes, freedom of speech – look in the homes. Who is happy? Did you know that if we had morality in the homes because of true love, the only structure of success for the family, only then we would have role models for the children to become their mothers (for girls), happy and respected, and that the fathers would be envied …for women would say they would like a man “like Jesus.” Imagine, whether you are gay, lesbian or straight, if you call it, how would your heart feel with Jesus as your father? Would you come and say, “Dad, I’m gay”, “Dad, I’m lesbian” or “Dad, I’m straight”? You would have to say nothing because you would be in awe at what you wish you were like, in looking at him. So imagine now that what we want as respect for the nation is to give men to look full of morality and respect, where ‘sexy’ would disappear into the ‘holiness’ look; where women themselves would find themselves literally the best server of the ‘Lord’, not as an obligation but as having been chosen among women by that one man, sort of ‘blessed among women’. Then it’s easy to say, “Blessed is the fruit of her womb.”
Blessed be Canada! Forms of immorality will be abolished immediately. The storms come quickly. It will be faster than the storm, because I am sick and tired of watching your daughters and your sons falling victim of sexuality, be it between men and men, women and woman, men and women and we’ll say women and men. It is unacceptable that we call it a ‘human right’ to be the breakdown of families, breaking peoples hearts and destroying the nation. We will put an end to it. Thank you for reading. Yours truly, The Father to the nation of all nations People’s Political Power Party of Canada 107 Marion Street |