A form of racism that has no colour nor religion nor language: the rich against the poor.  The gap between the two is in favour of the poor, not the rich.  How do we explain this: at election time, promises that are never delivered?  Who are they made to, these promises?  The poor that are looking for changes and never see it.

An example of this flagrant racism in Canada is in the north end of Winnipeg, where the housing value has dropped 85% because “There’s Indians there”.  Is it a way to provide cheap housing for the Natives, where some people have paid more for their house, some thirty or forty years ago?  Now they could give them away just like in the U.S.A. with the Blacks.  When a Black family moves into the area, all the houses go down in value. And I would like to see the one to tell me that there is none of this in Canada, that there is unity in Canada.

Does this mean that we have to make it impossible for the First Nation people to have decent housing?  We brag of a twelve billion dollar surplus where we do not even talk about healthcare much less housing for the First Nation, where we say: “Everything will get worse”.  Now we have pollution and racism and we use the disguise of unity by false billboards because nobody could see any unity in Canada.

This form of racism will end, from the Pacific to the Atlantic from the North Pole to the South Pole on both sides of the globe.  ‘The majority wins’ we say.  Why is it that the majority always loses?  Because of false promises like we find in the electoral system that 50/50 means 90% for the rich and 10% for the poor; where ninety percent of the population is in poverty and ten percent is in wealth.

This gap will disappear.  And those multinationals that think that they will control our economy forever, we have a plan for every industry that will shut down. Let the rich leave and let the majority take control of their own natural resources in a co-operative system, which leads to cooperation with the people.  And those who will call this communism or socialism (or any other form) we already have a form of dictatorship by the rich over the industry, where we will show them that if they are just and fair they have proven already how much they could take for themselves.  Therefore, they have no excuses to say that it can’t be done for all.  We will give the people of Canada back their natural resources and when every industry will be owned by the people of the community, we will have stability and it all begins in the structure of the family.  This is why our candidates must prove to us the respect for their wives, husbands and children.  If you can‘t show that you have stability at home, you have no business in greater than that.  You’ll make a mess.

This is why that a young Aboriginal man that we met who comes from The Pas, Manitoba, who said to me, “When we said we cannot blame the Lord for the mess of man,” (as the Lord said, “I’m not accessory to the crimes of man.”)  He said, (and it’s a young man who doesn’t’ go to church or anything) “Wow. All my hatred for the Church, for Jesus, for the priest has dropped now.  Now I know that he’s coming to save us.”

Then he said, “If I went to my community and that they would see it as you presented it to us, everybody would walk out and come and join you and the church and to rebuild this nation, other than all the criminals who came from Europe in these ships of which we are the descendants where now we will go clean up Europe too because now we know that thy Lord doesn’t make this mess but that he is here to save us.”  Then he said: “I’m moving back to Manitoba.  I want to go to my people I want to tell the good news!”  This is the work of the Lord, people.  Praise be to the greatest man that has ever lived, the Unknown Soldier, the only one who is about peace and not war.

Praise be the name of Peace, the Prince of Peace, the blueprint for Canada.

Thank you for reading.

Roger Poisson

People’s Political Power Party of Canada/Mission of the Shroud