| |
|
|
||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|||
Strange title but easily explained: If you have two children and there is a dispute between the two, and one of them says, “Whose side are you on?” So imagine the position that you’re put in. You may think that you have a choice by siding with the one that is right. But then you’re walking away from the one that’s wrong. It’s like a doctor going in the hallway and yelling out loud: “Here we function by priority, by who needs most. So everyone that has no problems - come first, because you are right. You are functioning good and the others can wait.” Does it make sense to you? But if the one that is right is truly right you will agree with that one, that together you could help the other one or you are both wrong. And then the other one is right. Because you side with the one that needs no help and reject the one in most need. Favoritism in the home is exactly what we’re talking about. When one could learn from the other because when one is accomplished, that one has a duty to be an example to the other. Why do we write this? You have seen on our site praising independent Conservatives who speak loud or Liberals or the Yukon Party or an MLA for Yukon, while they are all of different Parties. And we are another Party. So are we praising the Conservative government or the Liberal or the Yukon Party? No. We are praising the people’s choice – but the choice is those who speak up. It is not those that heckle about laws and regulations and not bringing solutions to the problem. So when we praise Mr. Turner, the silent ones we speak of were those who shrugged him for speaking out - whether he was right or wrong. But the conservative Party only used the term ‘Caucus secret’. But I would like to say that the things that Mr. Turner was trying to voice were prohibited from us to know as electors. So this tells me that in times of election, I will hear something that I want to hear and not the things that they hide from me. So we praise the individual and we are totally against family traditions of Liberalism, Conservatives, NDP-ers or any names of Parties. It is the individual whose hands are tied to speak to the risk of losing his job because of the dissention in the party. I praise Mr. Turner and the other people and not their Parties but the individuals that have received the attention of the public. So now that we have the attention of the people who wonder what side we’re on. We’re on the side of anyone that gets attention to problems. But we are more on the side of those who bring solutions where so far, we have hecklers, conniving and mudslinging but no answer to the problem. I had the pleasure of meeting with a provincial MLA that I admired for his outspokenness, Mr. Kevin Lamoureux of the Manitoba Liberal Party. Meeting with him in his office, I saw a man so devoted to the cause of poverty in Winnipeg, as specified by him to Winnipeg. But being an MLA for the province, Winnipeg seems more important because of the constituency. At this point, I would like to make clear that Mr. Lamoureux has made it clear to me that he has no intentions to ever leave the Liberal Party. But as he spoke, moving my heart that the constituents come first before the job, before the Party, before anything on the issue of poverty. I was moved by this. But until Mr. Lamoureux said to me: “But I have to be careful for being too outspoken and that many in our Party don’t agree with my outspokenness. Likewise with the opposition.” I reminded Mr. Lamoureux that the captain of the Titanic had on board his employer, the owner and all the richest people in the world. And when the boat sank the captain (the employee with gun in the hand) said: “Women and children first.” And there is not one coward rich man, including the owner of the Titanic that would have had the heart to say ‘Let my wife sink and kids because I’m the rich man.’ Suddenly, they met their souls and for the first time they all agreed, women and children first. Now we ask the rich people of today, the people in power that are sort of making Mr. Lamoureux shake in his own statement that the people come first because of the powers over him. I reminded Mr. Lamoureux that the captain of the family today is the one that will say: “The family first. I don’t give a darn if my boss in on board, but women and children first.” And how many are there in governments as in society that have not thought of themselves first before the women and children where most of them have walked away for other women if only in their minds. And when you are at the helm of a relationship between those who have believed in you and yourself and if you don’t say “Priority: women and children” you are the rich of the Titanic who would say: “I float and they sink.” And for Mr. Lamoureux: remember the point of decision is not your boss and those who may hate you but the decisive point in your position is your conscience. That’s where you decide if you’re really with the poor or betrayer of them because of fear. Fear and doubt are the beginning of betrayal. We leave the rest up to you, the readers. Never will anything come before women and children. Not only in this nation but also throughout the world with me fathering. Final word: women and children. May they be blessed and challenge me on my integrity because now I’m on all sides. Those who scream and are afraid, you could scream in front of me but if you have no answers, come and get one. Then you scream with the lottery in your hands because your hands are always in what you give. What other purpose do they have to receive, so you can give. So to all politicians and clergy:Canada is a Titanic right now. Who comes first? Thank you for reading. Roger Poisson |