| |
|
|
||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|||
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|||
Is challenging poverty attacking the poor or poverty itself? Either way, you have to attack it by resolving it or destroying it. Letting it linger on demonstrates the lack of caring from the world officials. It could then be looked at as an embarrassment or perhaps a world liability that could deplete every coffer of mankind, because in poverty you have an absence of a family environment, where sexuality becomes a living factor that increases your liability, your healthcare costs, your world over-population, and at the same time, opens the doors for excessive forms of terrorism in the name of ‘survival’. So what do we do with poverty? It is easy to tell today, with facts, that there is racism in poverty. For instance, you will very seldom see a White society in deep poverty, as you would perhaps see in African, Indian and Asian countries (like the Philippines). You will find that the uncaring leaderships of the nations find themselves into these starving nations, exploiting them on the basis of their natural resources, with a guaranteed minimum return for their money or resources, and at the same time, expanding their ventures of sexuality through drug trades, alcohol and sexual abuse. You find more White people going to such places (as we saw in a documentary from the Philippines) and using young women for their own means. At the same time, they are being racist in their own country by the ignorance that they have towards the plight of those people. Challenging poverty is a struggle because no one wants, (because of the love in his heart) to make it disappear. It would bring population control, not by spreading condoms and birth control and morning after pills in order to maintain sexual drive, (a bit like King Solomon in the name of God, wanting all the young women into his harem, using the name of God in vain). This is why these kings among kings are all buried under sand today. Poverty remains, it increases and sexual segregation exists by the division imposed by the liars who speak as gods, and behave in an evil way, if only by not caring enough to make a difference. If I ask you who is the worst of two men: first, the one who doesn’t give a hoot about the plight of others, versus the other one who believes he’s doing women a favour with a few dollars through the sex trade? Neither one is to be congratulated, but if the girl has a little more to eat with the ‘lesser one’, then the other guy becomes the lesser one, by not giving a care about the actions of the other man who at least extended life (should we say, survival) for another day of atrocities? Our proposal (which will become law in this land) will stand with us in the United Nations and before the leaders of the world, whether they like it or not. Our stand will be: that first this nation will become a family; where the mothers of this nation will discover, perhaps for the first time in their lives, the great importance that they have in the survival of the human race, and above all, will be praised by the members of her family, as being the survivor of survivors.
What man would marry if he could never touch the woman? They all have the disguise of the family, namely children; that they fend off through condoms and protection, even watching the calendar in order to maintain stability of their sexual drive. Women have become like the land of a farmer that is never given time to regain its strength, through the natural chemistries granted by our maker. She is abused and exploited on a continual basis. This is why … her cycle of reproduction is tampered with - with chemistries like the chickens that are made to lay eggs forcibly and end up with no feathers on their bodies because of sexual exploitation to produce eggs. But in woman, the sexual exploitation stops her from producing eggs – very unlike chickens. In such, we create an imbalance in her hormones that is the main cause of breast cancer today. And that will be proven soon, beyond any doubt, because we have information that will lead you, the readers, to understand the destruction of the structure of life’s possibilities. All other forms of diseases are now being proven, where women are being blamed that through her urinary secretions which end up in the waterways of the nations, the ecology is being effected, the wildlife habitat and the fish hormone deficiencies, namely omega 3, (which is there to re-instate stability in the human structure, it at all possible).
If you go to hydroponics, you go into waterways where you could grow vegetation faster. And in the genes within all seeds of vegetation, you will find universities destroying the seeds of fruits and their possibility of reproduction, in order to limit the quantities. I’ll give you an example: I once wanted to grow a cherry tree. I have a friend that works for the University of Manitoba. I used to think that all you have to do is let the seed dry in the window and then plant it. Nothing was happening. So I called my friend from the university, who is (or at least was, then) one of the highest efficient persons in agricultural research at the University of Manitoba. His reply was; “You will never be able to do it because all the seeds, the hybrid seeds, have to be grafted. This is how we control the abundance.” In other words, the female seeds, to simplify it for your eyes, receive ‘birth control’ so they cannot reproduce so that the big corporations have control on agriculture. Now they marry, through hybrid research, the male of a species with the female of another species to have a new product (in the name of sales), where others are diminished to the research into soya beans - where you could sell the farms for housing and control natural food, as they say, to supply the demand. Why can’t we do this for the poor, since you like experimenting anyways on guinea pigs? Since you know that it works, do we have excuses for the exploitation of the family and the environment - as much as you do in the human one? Food for thought. Contact us for more information: People’s Political Power Party of Canada |