Since we guarantee in writing to make Canada a family: where and how will the marriage take place (unless you truly believe that we don’t need marriage, to be a family)?

For the last ten years, hasn’t it been a headache for politicians who will perhaps say now: “Don’t tell me he’s bringing this up!  We thought it was dead!”  How can the family be dead and the nation exist?  It doesn’t make sense.  So since we signed it, we have to find an institution somewhere that has a direct connection with God, to make Canada a family through a definition of marriage. 

How can we marry people without having a definition?  Doesn’t that invalidate all marriage certificates?  Because the definition of marriage has to be a constitution that is acceptable by all parties that will form a family, where the family has to be the platform that they stand upon.

Imagine a stage without pillars underneath: I guess you’d have both feet on the ground!  Wouldn’t that spell equality?  Now let us get to the point of a definition of marriage: perhaps we have to remove the word ‘marriage’ from the dictionary since it has no definition.  And perhaps we should shut down all the churches or anyone that speaks of marriage.  So where do we go from here, defining marriage as a natural thing that makes everything green again?  Everything is now just natural, in that you could have children and then dump them like the animals that mate once a year.  So what do you do that you can’t stop mating? 

We hear about ‘roommates’, all kinds of mating  – with obstructions of all kinds because everything turns out as in nature - like the animals will mark their territory with their urine or pull out the bark of trees as to the one who is the strongest being the winner.  So since we haven’t wiped out the word ‘marriage’ from dictionaries and since the courts can’t define it, perhaps Mr. Larousse could tell us what marriage means.  Let’s be bilingual, or Mr. Webster: two dictionaries.

The dictionary is supposed to give you all possible definitions of a word.  Let us see what it says on marriage …

It will tell you that it is the merger of two people or substances in agreement with each other, to become a new structure, be it in nature or in humanity.  Is it not so that in every living person or object of nature you have a merger of male and female?  It is not sufficient to define marriage as a male and a female because then it contradicts the word ‘merger’, becoming one.

So any form of resistance to the merger, that is the child, you and me ... 

We have both substances of two people who have proven the merger in you:  the proof of a marriage.  So the true definition of marriage is every one of us that was born of two; male and female, regardless as to how you make this possible. 

We will go to the extent of in-vitro insemination, for instance, in the cattle industry.  A vet will take the sperm of a bull and inseminate the female with it.  We could say that this is giving birth … but before we go this far, the donor has to be qualified with the capability of reproductivity in giving of himself to the cow, in this case, where the farmer wants a good sperm so that he gets a good calf.

Do human females require a good quality sperm in order to have quality children?  Now, we have the natural part of insemination in the human way or the animal way.  And now we have to back off from the quality of donor and recipient.  However, would a farmer like to sow his garden on concrete?  And with good soil, would he love to receive, as the cemeteries do, a dead beat?  Let the dead bury their dead! 

So the farmer is more concerned about his fields then his own seed, of all people.  Hasn’t anybody ever wished for bright children, intelligent and healthy, that could compete on any T.V. contest against any other kid?  If so, now comes the infiltration of qualities within the donor and the recipient: just like a newborn baby … you’ve got to fill it up with love, knowledge and language.  Imagine, you have the doll in your hand and it can’t do a thing!  Isn’t that a failure?

This is where the quality of spiritual values, not religious (these are ritual values) has, as stated in the previous article, the feeling of love in your heart, that makes you become priceless, valuable and open on all learning channels - unlike internet and microwaves -  because nothing is greater than the naturality that you could give to anything or anyone that has no value, without love.  The proof of this is every one of us who are reading … we’re all looking to mean something to someone.

So if you define any religious or civil union as marriage without the definition of the spiritual values, what do you have – the world of today, an un-functioning society, un-functioning of what you call ‘human’ families.  There’s no definition of the family nor marriage - but everyone of us is suffering without the gift that we could give to each other by becoming something important into the family of Canada.

So how do we marry the nation if we want to make it a family?  Maybe we should go to the scriptures, where in the time of Israel you were allowed to shack up for one year before you could get married.  And then Moses offered you a certificate of divorce because it didn’t work!

So if we look at humanity today, what is marriage?  We’ll take you up on the one year of shacking up with you, and this one year of shacking up with you means my eyes are onyou – you’re good enough to enter the House of Commons.  Then I’ll prove my love to you by making this nation my family - to a definition of marriage which is you and me, where both have the male and female between us - and no structure of love … this is what this nation is missing.

In this family, there will be no room for dissatisfaction, because this satisfaction will make you wish to stay home and build a family with us, to make it a stepping-stone for other nations and in such, all weaknesses will disappear because the family is the true definition of unity, becoming a unit.

How do we achieve this in our one-year of shacking up with you?  Very simple: there are many men of good will who have proven in one way or the other that they have chosen God as the first of the Ten Commandments, that they have found no other God but God, that they have devoted themselves (at least in principle) to the service of the nation.  But we must remember that a principal is the one who makes every home his residence, not a residential school; that all people are invited in, and those who proclaim to be of God are all of God.  But those who have been truly moved and questioning ‘where is this God, now a days?’…you have to depart from taking the eloquence of speech…as people governed by the gift of the Holy Spirit, but acclaiming yourselves to be greater than others.  They have come this close to reality and made it no further, by selfishness, pride, greed, lust and omitting to look after their territorial families, their parishes, or their diocese, with the same love that everyone is looking forward to.

There are sufficient men that have devoted their lives to serving the world as their own family, where they had to reject the nation of their own heart … marriage was the last thing they could have ever wanted for themselves. 

Taking every child of your community, regardless of your standing in life, your churches or associations … taking them as your own, devoting yourselves as true fathers to your communities – only then would you have the right to be called  ‘father’.  Only then the miracle of transfiguration through your love, through your people, will you make them become transfigured from one way of life to living with God, with the good feelings in their hearts.

As a new government, such a means do exist, like good mothers who are not afraid to wipe the diapers without rejecting the child.  Those who will wish to father as such, will be those remnants that are spoken of that shall be gathered to make a new garment of this nation, through the lamb that has offered his life, who was a friend of the sinners.

 What is a sinner?  Couldn’t we say that a baby that soils his diapers is a sinner?  Likewise for all who soil themselves, however they do … we have to be godparents to everyone of this nation.

From all races to all forms of disobedience, love is the greatest teacher of all.  We need to gather the people of good will - those who have truly devoted their lives to God, only so that he may teach them in the days that we live, how to have an immaculate conception of the Word of God.  That invites them to have the children of this nation without any thoughts of flesh, not thinking less of them because they have gone astray … in such, reflecting the love that they receive in their vows, to go through all nations of the world and be known as fathers.

If you feel qualified to be one of those men devoted to serving the world as God is, leave all your own possessions … your possessions always begin by your desires and wishes for yourselves.  And you must abandon all these things to be fair to all. Then the nation will call upon you without shame, without pride, with hunger for the word that shall be lived before their hearts.  This is unity.